The by products of a divorce settlement mandated by the courts often
include diminished self esteem, persistent hostility, reduced productivity
and strained relations among spouses and their children.
Collaborative Practice is a relatively new, non-adversarial, alternative
approach to litigation that differs from Mediation in that clients
retain individual representation.
The differences between collaborative and conventional divorce include
the use of a Collaborative Team,
the Collaborative Process,
Timing & Costs and applicability
for Clients.
In a Collaborative Divorce, clients and their counsel formally agree
not to go to court. The advantages of this approach are multiple:
- Clients keep control of the process themselves and do not face
the possibility of a disadvantageous ruling imposed by the court
- Children’s needs are given priority. The problem solving
approach employed throughout the Collaborative Process serves
as a basis for positive long term post-divorce interactions critical
to the well being of children
- Collaborative Divorce typically costs less in dollars and time
and often serves particularly well for financially complex situations
- Clients typically maintain greater self esteem and dignity and
private situations do not pass into the public domain
Walther Family Law attorneys are committed to providing New Mexicans
with this alternative to conventional divorce and are all well versed
in Collaborative Law. Gretchen Walther pioneered the use of the
collaborative approach in New Mexico, has served as President of
the New Mexico Collaborative Practice and frequently writes and
trains other professional on collaborative practice. (To view her
latest presentations, click
here)
The Collaborative Team
Clients can initiate the Collaborative Process through any potential
member of a divorce team. Although teams always consist of at least
both spouses and their respective lawyers, they may also involve
other professionals, including:
- A neutral financial specialist to help clients
in gathering all necessary financial information and work with
the couple and their lawyers to clearly delineate the present
and future financial consequences of various possible settlement
options
- A neutral child specialist who talks with the
parents and the children to assess the children’s needs
and concerns. The child specialist is not a custody evaluator
and does not make specific recommendations, but instead works
with the parents to help them make informed decisions for their
children’s long term well being.
- Divorce coaches for each spouse. These members
of the team are typically mental health professionals who help
spouses to improve their communication and negotiation skills
and deal with the anger typically involved in divorce proceedings
without rupturing the collaborative process.
Teams are selected by the clients at the beginning of the case
from among those professionals who have been trained in and have
opted to participate in collaborative divorces. All participating
professionals agree to withdraw from the case if it becomes a court
process.
The Collaborative Process
Clients typically meet separately first with their lawyers and divorce
coaches. During these individual meetings, clients learn how to
communicate effectively and discuss options for various aspects
of the settlement. All assets and other pertinent information are
fully disclosed. Throughout, a “trust and verify” approach
is used to avoid expensive legal procedures typically required in
conventional divorces simply to obtain financial information.
Individual meetings are followed by four (or more)-way meetings
in which spouses and their lawyers work out the basic components
of the settlement. Team members may call each other to verify information,
make proposals or request additional group meetings. The couple,
together with their attorneys, then craft their financial settlement
and parenting arrangements.
The next step is for one of the parties’ lawyers to translate
the agreements into legal documents, which are then submitted to
the Court as an uncontested divorce. There is usually no Court hearing
on Collaborative cases.
If no agreement can be reached and the clients opt for court, collaborative
team members withdraw from the case and clients retain new representation.
This potential end result acts as a powerful disincentive for all
involved and contributes to “getting past the impasse”
in many difficult cases.
 |
Collaborative Divorce
Timing & Costs
Individual circumstances determine how quickly any divorce process
proceeds, but a Collaborative Divorce is often a more efficient
process. Full voluntary disclosure aids in speeding the divorce
along, as does the lack of time spent waiting for the multiple court
appointments typical in conventional divorce.
Costs are generally lower as well and can run as little as one third
the cost of a litigated divorce with the same circumstances.
Appropriate Clients
for Collaborative Divorce
Collaborative Divorce is not appropriate for all cases. Clients
must be able to agree to the voluntary and free exchange of all
relevant information and must commit to resolving disputes respectfully.
Cases in which either client has significant mental illness, a history
of domestic violence or substance abuse usually require specialized
profession evaluations and court mandated counseling or treatment.
|